Research
What am I missing?
Argue against your own conclusion.
- critique
- blind spots
- decisions
The prompt
I have concluded: {{conclusion}}
My reasoning: {{reasoning}}
Argue the other side properly. Name the assumptions I have not examined, the
evidence I would need to be wrong, and the failure mode I am least likely to
notice.
Do not hedge into "both have merit". If the conclusion survives, say which single
piece of reasoning is carrying it — that is the part worth double-checking. What to fill in
- {{conclusion}}
- What you've concluded — e.g. we should sync prompts through the existing CloudKit zone
- {{reasoning}}
- Your reasoning — e.g. one zone to fetch, tombstones already handled
What it produces
Unexamined: that one zone means one fetch. It also means one
failure domain — a prompt-record schema error stalls clip sync
too. You haven't priced that.
To be wrong you'd need: prompt volume high enough that zone
fetches get slow, or a prompt-side error that blocks clips.
Least likely to notice: tombstone collision between the two
record types in the same zone.
Carrying the conclusion: "one zone to fetch". Check that. 117 prompts, in the app you already paste from
The whole library, searchable, with your own prompts alongside it. Free to browse here; Pro to keep them a keystroke away on every device.